http://www.criticalglobalisation.com
From Intute.ac.uk
http://www.criticalglobalisation.com
From Intute.ac.uk
Globalizations is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal which aims to provide "the widest possible space for discussion of alternatives to a narrow economic understanding of globalization. The move from the singular to the plural is deliberate and implies scepticism of the idea that there can ever be a single theory or interpretation of the term". The journal publishes research that explores and discusses "multiple interpretations and multiple processes that may constitute many possible globalizations, many possible alternatives". Topics include global political economy, the global environment, global public health, global gender relations, global human security, global culture, global governance and global ethics.
From Celia: The Library has online access to the full-text articles from 2004; however there is a 12 month embargo preventing online access to the most recent articles.

The World Social Forum (WSF) is an opened space – plural, diverse, non-governmental and non-partisan – that stimulates the decentralized debate, reflection, proposals building, experiences exchange and alliances among movements and organizations engaged in concrete actions towards a more solidary, democratic and fair world.
The World Social Forum (WSF) is an annual meeting held by members of the anti-globalization (using the term globalization in a doctrinal sense not a literal one) or alter-globalization movement to coordinate world campaigns, share and refine organizing strategies, and inform each other about movements from around the world and their issues. It tends to meet in January when its "great capitalist rival", the World Economic Forum is meeting in Davos, Switzerland. The date was chosen because of the logistical difficulty of organizing a mass protest in Davos and to try to overshadow the coverage of the World Economic Forum in the news media.
Companies in the U.S. and Western Europe once had unfettered access to the world’s resources, such as raw materials, capital and talent. Thanks to increasing demand from India, China, Brazil, Russia and other rapidly developing economies, however, that access is no longer assured. In this special report, experts from Wharton and The Boston Consulting Group discuss the ways in which this unprecedented “race” for resources is reshaping global business, and how key political and financial trends in emerging economies are likely to affect companies anywhere in the world.
+ Full Report (PDF; 599 KB)
Source: Knowledge@Wharton
Permalink: Docuticker
UN Pulse Permanent Link: Globalization and Languages - UNESCO/UNU conference
The International Labour Conference has adopted a declaration and resolution on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization (full text of drafts adopted, pdf, 193 KB). According to the ILO press release,
"Through
the Declaration governments, employers and workers from all member States call
for a new strategy to sustain open economies and open societies based on social
justice, full and productive employment, sustainable enterprises and social
cohesion. The Declaration acknowledges the benefits of globalization but calls
for renewed efforts to implement decent work policies as the means to achieve
improved and fair outcomes for all."
UN Pulse Permanent Link: Social Justice for Fair Globalization
This index is published annually by Foreign Policy magazine in
partnership with A.T. Kearney to measure countries on their economic,
personal, technological, and political integration. Users may download
charts and tables which rank and compare the nations in terms of a
number of factors relating to globalization. These include:
international trade, membership of international organisation, internet
access. There is some historical comparison with data from 2006.
Information on the methodology used to compiled the datasets is
provided.
From Intute.ac.uk
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=3995
The Center for Popular Economics is a non-profit group of political
economists, based at Amherst, MA. in the United States. It "simplifies
the economy and put useful economic tools in the hands of people
fighting for social and economic justice. We examine root causes of
economic inequality and injustice including systems of oppression based
on race, class, gender, nation and ethnicity." The Center organises
workshops and events to allow networking opportunities, produces
resources such as the Field Guide to the US Economy and Globalization
Briefs and their website includes further details about their work. From Intute.ac.uk
http://www.populareconomics.org/
Pew Global Attitudes Project (47 Nations Surveyed)
Direct to SummaryThe publics of the world broadly embrace key tenets of economic globalization but fear the disruptions and downsides of participating in the global economy. In rich countries as well as poor ones, most people endorse free trade, multinational corporations and free markets. However, the latest Pew Global Attitudes survey of more than 45,000 people finds they are concerned about inequality, threats to their culture, threats to the environment and threats posed by immigration. Together, these results reveal an evolving world view on globalization that is nuanced, ambivalent, and sometimes inherently contradictory. There are signs that enthusiasm for economic globalization is waning in the West — Americans and Western Europeans are less supportive of international trade and multinational companies than they were five years ago. In contrast, there is near universal approval of global trade among the publics of rising Asian economic powers China and India.
Direct to Full Text: World Publics Welcome Global Trade – But Not Immigration
144 pages; PDF.
See Also: Dataset Download
…contains links to the Project’s survey data which are currently available on the web. Survey data are released after all reporting is completed and are posted on the web as quickly as possible.
Source: Pew Global Attitudes Project (via Basefsky’s IWS Documented News Service)
Permalink Resourceshelf
How to Save Globalization from its Cheerleaders
Source: Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government, Faculty Research Working Paper Series
The new conventional wisdom on globalization emphasizes that reaping the benefits of trade and financial integration is not automatic, and requires better domestic institutions, essentially improved safety nets in rich countries and improved governance in the poor countries. The prevailing strategy is predicated on the presumption that insufficiently open markets continue to pose an important constraint on the world economy. In reality, lack of openness is no longer the binding constraint for the global economy. The gains to be reaped by further liberalization of markets are meager for poor and rich countries alike. An alternative approach to globalization would focus on enhancing policy space rather than market access, and on devising the rules of the game to better manage the interface between national regulatory and social regimes. It is possible to envisage such rules without slipping back into protectionism.
+ Full Paper (PDF; 264 KB)
Permalink Docuticker