2010 South African Reconciliation Barometer Released

Reconciliation South Africa Trackbacks (0)

Press Release: Economic insecurity threatens 2010 World Cup gains, survey finds

 South Africans are increasingly worried about their economic security putting at risk gains that have been made and leading to significant stress, a major reconciliation survey has found. 

 “Human security concerns have been amongst the country’s biggest challenges,” said the Institute of Justice’s Kate Lefko-Everett and “one could argue one of the areas in which progress has been the slowest”.

On the positive side there has been a moderate overall improvement in perceptions of physical security and safety which “goes some way to offset the negative social consequences of physical insecurity”, said Lefko-Everett.

An important trend reversal in this year’s Institute of Justice and Reconciliation’s 10th South African Reconciliation Barometer (SARB) is South Africans’ confidence in public institutions. There was a marked decline in trust in public institutions between 2006 and 2009 across all spheres of government. However, in 2010 this trend has reversed with a reported increase in confidence in most institutions.

Lefko-Everett said the concern felt about the economy and unemployment had likely been influenced by the global recession. In 2010 the third-quarter unemployment rate stood at 25.3 percent.

“Research has confirmed links between economic hardship and insecurity, leading to significant personal stress and even health risks. This also heightens the possibility of social conflict,” said Lefko-Everett.

In 2010 South Africans view political party membership and socio economic inequality as the things that divide them the most. A slightly lower percentage of 21% of respondents view race as the biggest division in the country in 2010.

“This survey shows a shift since 2004 with respondents feeling less economically secure. They also feel that their personal and economic situations have declined. South Africans are more pessimistic about employment prospects and are not convinced that their personal financial situations will improve. They feel that their living conditions have declined,” said Lefko-Everett.  They are also uncomfortable about the increasing gap between the wealthy and the poor in South Africa, with South Africa’s Gini Coefficient (the global measurement of the gap between rich and poor in countries) being amongst the highest in the world.

According to the survey most South Africans believe that all language groups and religious groups are treated equally, however just over half of all respondents feel other social or cultural groups are treated more favourably than their own. “This raises questions about changes that have to take place in South Africa in order for citizens to believe in equality of treatment and for it to take root,” said Lefko-Everett.

The improvement in faith in public institutions is probably due to greater political stability at the executive level of government between 2006 and 2009, and the boost the country received from the successful hosting of the Fifa 2010 Soccer World Cup.

“This is a very positive sign,” said Lefko-Everett, “however it is important that public institutions are able to weather and withstand political turbulence, without losing substantial confidence by citizens.”

In terms of how South Africans identify themselves and identify with each other after 16 years of democracy the survey found:

  • Most of us identify ourselves primarily by language, ethnic group or race;
  • There is a high level of agreement that primary identity is a source of positive identity making people feel important and good about themselves;
  • 47% of all South Africans believe race relations have improved since 1994, 30% think they have stayed the same and 21% think they have deteriorated;
  • On a typical workday 38% of all South Africans say they often or always speak to someone from another race group, 20% say they sometimes do, while 42% rarely or never do. However, 30% say they would like to talk to people from other race groups more than they do at the moment;
  • Twenty-one percent of South Africans often or always socialise with people of other races in their homes or with friends, 18% say they sometimes do, while 60% rarely or never do;
  • Contact and socialisation between South Africans is highest in wealthy households with a dramatic decrease among poorer households;
  • Since 2003 there has been a slight increase in the percentage of respondents who find people of other races hard to understand, but this should be balanced against an increased approval for greater integration in terms of inter-racial marriages, schools, being employed by someone of a another race, and neighbourhoods.

Issued by on behalf of the Institute for Justice and Reconciliation by HWB Communications

Full report

 

Centre For The Study Of Violence And Reconciliation (SA)

Violence Reconciliation South Africa Trackbacks (0)
The Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation is a South African based research body. Founded in January 1989 under the name of the Project for the Study of Violence, it now conducts research into peacebuilding, reconciliation, gender equality and justice, criminal justice and reconciliation in post Apartheid South Africa. Its website provides information on its history, aims and activities. It includes access to full text papers and reports. These include coverage of restorative justice, reconciliation and the work of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) in South Africa.From Intute.ac.uk
http://www.csvr.org.za/

SA RECONCILIATION BAROMETER, 2008

Reconciliation Trackbacks (0)

SA RECONCILIATION BAROMETER, 2008: 8TH ROUND MEDIA BRIEFING

Institute for Justice and Reconciliation, 4 December 2008

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This document reflects on key findings of the 8th Round of the SA Reconciliation Barometer Survey that was conducted during April and May of 2008. The survey tracks public sentiment towards socio-political change and how it impacts on the broader South African national reconciliation project. Since its inception in 2003 the survey’s methodology has been based on the measurement of six key reconciliation hypotheses relating to human security, political culture, cross-cutting political relationships, dialogue, historical confrontation and race relations by tracking those indicators that underpin their primary variables. The project recognises that all of these facets of reconcilition does not always carry equal weight and that emphasis may shift depending on circumstances.

Given the current global context of economic uncertainty, this briefing focuses on the human security hypothessis, which posits that if citizens do not feel threatened, they are more likely to be reconciled with each other and the larger system. Such threat is understood in economic, physical, and also cultural terms.

The results of this round of the survey shows that there was a marked level of volatility, brought on by a general deterioration of material circumstances, within the South African society at the time that it was conducted. Citizens felt economically less secure, physically more unsafe, and less confident about their future, particularly as such confidence pertains to relations between South Africans of different faces. This points to the possible strain that such levels of insecurity may be putting on the cohesion of society. As in most developing societies, such strain tends to expose key social faultlines, and when it errupts in violent demonstrations of discontent, it tests the robustness of systems of governance. In these circumtances trust becomes a vital commodity to the institutions that constitute such systems and those that are in charge of them. The SARB Survey data shows that while significant levels of trust are still vested in these entitities, much of it has been eroded in recent years. Capacity and skills deficits that retard government efforts to reduce citizen vulnerability may be at the heart of this. As government revenues are likely to dwindle during the economic slowdown, such skills and capacity may be put under further pressure. If this is not managed correctly, we may witness growing levels of social discontent and violent protest. The xenophobic violence of May this year has reminded us how vulnerable we are in such a situation.

The briefing, in conclusion, warns that in the run-up to the 2009 general elections, political parties and individuals ought to be aware of the volatility that currently permeates South African society. Many that live in material deprivation may under the current circumtances be highly succeptable to the increasingly radical rhetoric of political parties. Great care should be taken that such inflamatory language does not jeapordise the relative political stability that we have enjoyed since 1994.

Reconciliation Resource Network (RRN)

Reconciliation Trackbacks (0)
Reconciliation Resource Network
Website of the Reconciliation Resource Network (RRN) a project of the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA) an intergovernmental organisation that supports and promotes democracy worldwide. The RRN is made up of reconciliation practitioners, analysts and policy makers and its aim is to serve as an online forum for sharing information, best practices and resources. The site provides information about and links to partner organisations and individual members. A database providing information on reconciliation projects can be searched by country or topic including reconciliation, conflict, mediation, peace, dialogue, democracy and women. There is a description and organisational information for each project. The site also has a number of discussion forums some of which are open to members only. From Intute.ac.uk
http://www.idea.int/rrn/index.cfm

The Legacy Of The Northern Ireland Troubles: How To Build A New Community Unburdened By The Past

Reconciliation Trackbacks (0)
Consultative Group on the Past
The Consultative Group on the Past was independent body who considered issues relating to the legacy of the Northern Ireland troubles and how to move forward to build a new community unburdened by the past. It was chaired by Lord Robin Eames and Denis Bradley and produced its final report in January 2009. The website provides information on the aims, membership and findings of the group. It includes press releases and the full text of the final report. Topics considered include: the cost of the troubles to Northern Ireland, compensation for victims and survivors of the conflict, reconciliation, commemoration and the future work of a legacy commission. From Intute.ac.uk
http://www.cgpni.org/

OHCHR Report On Northern Uganda "Making Peace Our Own"

Africa United Nations Reconciliation Trackbacks (0)

The UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights OHCHR released a new report Making Peace Our Own: Victims' Perceptions of Accountability, Reconciliation and Transitional Justice in Northern Uganda. The report adds to the discussions of accountability and reconciliation processes in the country, which currently take place after more than 20 years of conflict between the Ugandan Government and the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA). The report is based on the results of the study conducted in Northern Uganda from January to June 2007 and assesses the perceptions of the victims of these issues.
Download the report (2.35 MB) or text of the Agreement on Accountability and Reconciliation between the Government of Uganda and the Lord's Resistance Army Movement, signed in Juba, 29 June 2007 (S/2007/435). UN Pulse Permalink