Tibet: Problems, Prospects, and U.S. Policy (PDF; 170 KB)
Source: Congressional Research Service (via Federation of American Scientists)
On March 10, 2008, a series of demonstrations began in Lhasa and other
Tibetan regions of China to mark the 49th anniversary of an
unsuccessful Tibetan uprising against Chinese rule in 1959. The
demonstrations appeared to begin peacefully with small groups that were
then contained by security forces. Both the protests and the response
of the PRC authorities escalated in the ensuing days, spreading from
the Tibetan Autonomous Region (TAR) into parts of Sichuan, Gansu, and
Qinghai Provinces with Tibetan populations. By March 14, 2008, mobs of
angry people were burning and looting establishments in downtown Lhasa.
Authorities of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) responded by
sealing off Tibet and moving in large-scale security forces. Beijing
has defended its actions as appropriate and necessary to restore civil
order and prevent further violence. Still, China’s response has
resulted in renewed calls for boycotts of the Beijing Olympics opening
ceremony on August 8, 2008, and for China to hold talks with the Dalai
Lama.
China sees itself as having provided Tibet with extensive economic
assistance and development using money from central government coffers,
and PRC officials often seem perplexed at the simmering anger many
Tibetans nevertheless retain against them. Despite the economic
development, Tibetans charge that the PRC interferes with Tibetan
culture and religion. They cite as examples: Beijing’s interference in
1995 in the choice of the Panchen Lama, Tibet’s second highest- ranking
personage; enactment of a “reincarnation law” in 2007 requiring
Buddhist monks who wish to reincarnate to obtain prior approval from
Beijing; and China’s policy of conducting “patriotic education”
campaigns, as well as efforts to foster atheism, among the Tibetan
religious community. The PRC defends the campaigns as a tool to help
monks become loyal, law-abiding citizens of China. Controversy over the
role of the Dalai Lama and the impact of PRC control on Tibet’s
language, culture, and religion have prompted recurring actions by
Congress in support of Tibet’s traditions — actions routinely denounced
by Beijing.
Members of the 110th Congress have responded to the March 2008
demonstrations and crackdowns with legislation requiring U.S.
government officials to boycott the Beijing Olympics opening ceremony
(H.R. 5668); proposals condemning the crackdown and asking Beijing to
hold talks with the Dalai Lama (H.Res. 1075 and H.Res. 1077); and the
formation of a new Tibet Caucus. Many fear there is little hope that
Beijing will make significant changes in its Tibet policy, despite even
the urgent advice of China’s friends. Beijing appears to have
calculated that it can out-wait the 72-year-old Dalai Lama, and that
his demise will result in the Tibetan movement’s disintegration. But
many see the Dalai Lama and his influence within the Tibetan community
as the key to unlocking China’s difficulties in Tibet. They see China’s
rejection of the Dalai Lama’s “middle way” approach as having undercut
his ability to influence younger, more militant Tibetans.
They believe his death, without having reached an understanding from
Beijing for greater Tibetan autonomy, would remove an important source
of restraint on more ideological elements in the Tibetan community.
This report will be updated as events warrant.