Global Open Access Portal.UNESCO

Posted by Celia Walter | 4 Nov, 2011

The Global Open Access Portal (GOAP), funded by the Governments of Colombia, Denmark, Norway, and the United States Department of State, presents a current snapshot of the status of Open Access (OA) to scientific information around the world. For countries that have been more successful implementing Open Access, the portal highlights critical success factors and aspects of the enabling environment. For countries and regions that are still in the early stages of Open Access development, the portal identifies key players, potential barriers and opportunities.

The Global Open Access Portal is designed to provide the necessary information for policy-makers to learn about the global OA environment and to view their country’s status, and understand where and why Open Access has been most successful.

At a glance, the portal provides an overview of the framework surrounding Open Access in UNESCO Member States by focusing on:

  • the critical success factors for effectively implementing Open Access;
  • each country’s strengths and opportunities for further developments;
  • where mandates for institutional deposits and funding organization have been put into place;
  • potential partners at the national and regional level; and
  • funding, advocacy, and support organizations throughout the world...[More]

 

http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/

 

South Africa 

South Africa is a leading African country in terms of Open Access (OA) policies on the governmental level and grass-roots OA initiatives in universities and research organizations.

All 11 traditional universities (or at least their departments), two universities of technology (Cape Peninsula University of Technology and Durban University of Technology), three comprehensive universities (University of Johannesburg, University of South Africa and University of Zululand) and Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) have set up OA repositories.

University of Pretoria and University of Johannesburg have adopted OA policies (mandates) to ensure that results of researches funded by institutions are made freely available.

Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf) manages the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) SA – a premier OA searchable full-text journal database that covers a selected collection of peer-reviewed scholarly journals (20 OA journals and growing) implementing recommendations from its Report on a Strategic Approach to Research Publishing in South Africa. SciELO SA is funded by the South African Department of Science and Technology and endorsed by the South African Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET).

43 OA journals are registered in DOAJ (the Directory of Open Access Journals covering free, full text, quality controlled scientific and scholarly journals).

The Human Sciences Research Council Press has a dual-stream strategy including: OA full texts online and print copies for sale. A groundbreaking ASSAf’s report entitled Scholarly Books: their production, use and evaluation in South Africa today approved by DHET recommends that “the principle of maximising OA, already recommended by the Academy for scholarly journals, be extended as far as possible (and with careful attention to sustainable business models) to books published (or co-published) in South Africa, with the adoption of formats and technology platforms compatible with bibliometric requirements such as citation indexing and information rich online features.”

And a strong OA community of practice has grown up sharing knowledge and expertise in the country, on African continent and worldwide...[more]

Royal Society Journal Archive: Free to Access

Posted by Celia Walter | 27 Oct, 2011

...The Royal Society has today announced that its world-famous historical journal archive – which includes the first ever peer-reviewed scientific journal – has been made permanently free to access online.

Around 60,000 historical scientific papers are accessible via a fully searchable online archive, with papers published more than 70 years ago now becoming freely available.

The Royal Society is the world’s oldest scientific publisher, with the first edition of Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society appearing in 1665.  Henry Oldenburg – Secretary of the Royal Society and first Editor of the publication – ensured that it was “licensed by the council of the society, being first reviewed by some of the members of the same”, thus making it the first ever peer-reviewed journal.

Philosophical Transactions had to overcome early setbacks including plague, the Great Fire of London and even the imprisonment of Oldenburg, but against the odds the publication survived to the present day.  Its foundation would eventually be recognised as one of the most pivotal moments of the scientific revolution.

...Treasures in the archive include Isaac Newton’s first published scientific paper, geological work by a young Charles Darwin, and Benjamin Franklin’s celebrated account of his electrical kite experiment.  And nestling amongst these illustrious papers, readers willing to delve a little deeper into the archive may find some undiscovered gems from the dawn of the scientific revolution – including accounts of monstrous calves, grisly tales of students being struck by lightning, and early experiments on to how to cool drinks “without the Help of Snow, Ice, Haile, Wind or Niter, and That at Any Time of the Year.”

...The move is being made as part of the Royal Society’s ongoing commitment to open access in scientific publishing.  Opening of the archive is being timed to coincide with Open Access Week, and also comes soon after the Royal Society announced its first ever fully open access journal, Open Biology.

From a Royal Society Announcement

Direct to Searchable Archive
The oldest publication in the database dates back to January 1665.

This post appeared on INFOdocket

Private Sector Benefits from Open Access to Higher Education and Scholarly Research

Posted by Celia Walter | 24 Oct, 2011

Title: The Benefits to the Private Sector of Open Access to Higher Education and Scholarly Research (52 pages; PDF)
Authors: Dr. David Parsons, Dick Willis and Dr. Jane Holland

and

Title: Open Access Fees Report
Commissioned by Open Access Implementation Group

...

Professor Martin Hall vice-chancellor at the University of Salford and chair of the OAIG says, “The report ‘Benefits to the Private Sector of Open Access to Higher Education and Scholarly Research’ shows how commercial companies would benefit from reduced costs, less time wasting, and shortened development cycles by having greater access to UK research outputs".

Read the Complete Summary

See Also:

From InfoDocket

Nature's open-access journal, death knell for subs model?

Posted by Celia Walter | 1 Feb, 2011
Scientific Reports and success of PLoS ONE spell trouble for specialist journals. Paul Jump reports

The launch by Nature Publishing Group (NPG) of a high-volume open-access journal spanning the natural sciences is being tipped to accelerate the extinction of subscription fees in science publishing, and could also prompt the closure of many specialist journals.

Scientific Reports will launch this summer and will cover biology, chemistry, the earth sciences and physics.

Like the Public Library of Science's PLoS ONE journal, Scientific Reports will be entirely open access and will publish every submission deemed by a faster peer-review process to be technologically sound - including those reporting useful negative results.

The importance of articles will be left to readers to judge via comments and metrics such as how often papers are downloaded, emailed and blogged about.

At $1,350 (£890), Scientific Reports' article-processing charge will be the same as that levied by PLoS ONE - although it is set to rise next year to $1,700.

...[more]

http://www.nature.com/scientificreports

From THE

ScienceLeaks

Posted by Celia Walter | 21 Jan, 2011

This blog exists so that people may anonymously post links to peer-reviewed scientific papers that been liberated from behind journal-subscription paywalls. Use comments in the 'Requests for papers' threads to post requests for papers, and comments in the 'Papers available' threads to post links to the requested pdfs.
http://scienceleaks.blogspot.com/

Introducing Science Leaks

 This venture was triggered by the many people complaining that they couldn't evaluate the 'arseniclife' paper because the journal Science only allowed access to its abstract, not to the full paper or its supplementary online materials.  In response, Science temporarily opened access to people wiling to register at their site, but when the month ends the barrier will go right back up.

This access problem applies to the great majority of scientific papers.  The public pays for the research, but the results are locked behind journal-subscription paywalls, accessible only to people with personal subscriptions or affiliated with major research libraries, or to those willing to pay $20-$40 for access to individual articles.

Most researchers agree that this legacy of the pre-internet days is morally wrong and unfair to everyone.  Those of us who can afford it pay thousands of dollars to the journals to make our own articles open access.  And many of us post PDFs of our own papers on our personal web sites.  But these aren't easy to find, especially for people not working in the field.

So I've set up a web site called Science Leaks (actually a Blogger blog) to serve as a clearing house, providing links to the papers people want to read.  Anyone who's looking for access to a paper can simply post the paper's information as a comment, and anyone who knows where a pdf is available can then post the link.  (Once a link is posted I'll remove the request comment, to keep things tidy.)

This is just a stopgap solution.  In the short term, if there's sufficient interest someone will (I hope) help me to set up a better site.  But the real solution is to change from having subscribers pay publication costs to having granting agencies pay them, either directly or as a line item in grant budgets.

From CW : a comment on the above post on ScienceLeaks refered to this Google Getarticles Group

Finding journal articles is often difficult. If you're looking for one, just email the citation to getarticles@googlegroups.com and our team of volunteers will try to find it for you.

If you like finding journal articles, please join the list or follow our RSS feed and reply to people's requests.

http://groups.google.com/group/getarticles

 

Open Access and Researchers. JISC

Posted by Celia Walter | 22 Oct, 2010

The research outputs of a university are significant assets for both the institution and for the individual researcher. But if they are not easily accessible they are not known about, they are not shared and built upon and they are not cited.

Open Access repositories are the easiest way to open up the research knowledge base to all.

Open Access repositories, where researchers can deposit a version of a paper that has been published in an academic journal and make it freely available to everyone, are the easiest way to open up the research knowledge base to all.

Through a recent programme, JISC has funded 44 projects to help institutions to build their first repositories or enhance existing ones. A new programme is funding 10 projects to start new repositories and 16 repository enhancement projects. JISC's Welsh Repository Network project has put a repository in every higher education institution in Wales, making it the first country in the UK – and one of the few in the world – to achieve that coverage.

The JISC repositories roadmap takes the programme to 2012 and sets out some of the exciting routes JISC believes repositories can take, now and in the future, to provide even greater benefits to institutions and researchers. These include:

  • Providing services such as profiles and bibliographies for academics to collect and display all their papers in one place
  • Collecting statistics about how many times a paper has been downloaded, and from which countries
  • Implementing robust preservation policies
  • Expanding to include research data and learning resources
Research into Open Access

 

  • JISC reports for Researchers
  • JISC reports for Institutions
  • Documents & Multimedia
http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/topics/opentechnologies/openaccess/researchers.aspx

Open Access Scholarly Information Sourcebook (OASIS)

Posted by Celia Walter | 13 Jun, 2009

"The Open Access Scholarly Information Sourcebook (OASIS) aims to provide an authoritative 'sourcebook' on Open Access, covering the concept, principles, advantages, approaches and means to achieving it. The site highlights developments and initiatives from around the world, with links to diverse additional resources and case studies. As such, it is a community-building as much as a resource-building exercise. Users are encouraged to share and download the resources provided, and to modify and customize them for local use"

From Peter Scott's Library blog

Understanding Open Access in the Academic Environment.

Posted by Celia Walter | 4 Jul, 2008

Kylie Pappalardo and the Open Access to Knowledge (OAK) Law Project released a comprehensive, book-length guide for scholarly authors, Understanding Open Access in the Academic Environment.
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2008/07/book-length-guide-to-oa-for-academic.html

SPARC Newsletter 

Harvard Faculty Adopts Open-Access Requirement

Posted by Celia Walter | 14 Feb, 2008

Harvard University’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences adopted a policy this evening that requires faculty members to allow the university to make their scholarly articles available free online...

Chronicle of Higher Education News Blog 

Open access and the developing world. BioMed Central Blog

Posted by Celia Walter | 6 Feb, 2008
http://blogs.openaccesscentral.com/blogs/bmcblog/entry/open_access_and_the_developing4

Open Access

Posted by Celia Walter | 21 Jan, 2008

Open Access News

Open-access (OA) research output is digital, online, free of charge, and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions. This blog reports thoughts, technologies and trends in this dynamic and contentious environment. Reports on open data issues (which apply OA ethos to research data). Contains a link to a comprehensive summary of open access (http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm)
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/fosblog.html

Open Access Evangelism Steven Harnad's (University of Southampton) blog about all things open access. Reports on open data (relevant to Statistics and Data section) and related issues in a forthright yet informed manner
http://openaccess.eprints.org/

From Intute.ac.uk 

Progress of open access journal publishing from SPAC and ACRL

Posted by Celia Walter | 6 Nov, 2007

SPARC and ACRL release materials on the progress of open access journal publishing
From the announcement:
SPARC (The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition) and the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL), have released interviews and analysis exploring in depth the views of three major open access publishers on the challenges of sustainability. The materials were produced in conjunction with the 15th SPARC-ACRL Forum on Emerging Issues in Scholarly Communication, which took place on June 23, 2007.
Read the rest of this entry »

Resourceshelf

Pricing of Academic Journals

Posted by Celia Walter | 18 Sep, 2007

The Pricing of Academic Journals: A Two-Sided Market Perspective (PDF; 356 KB)

More and more academic journals adopt an open-access policy, by which articles are accessible free of charge, while publication costs are recovered through author fees. We study the consequences of this open access policy on a journal’s quality standard. If the journal’s objective was to maximize social welfare, open access would be optimal as soon as the positive externalities generated by its diffusion exceed the marginal cost of distribution. However, if the journal has a different objective (such as maximizing its impact), the move from the traditional reader-pays model to the open-access model may result in a decrease in quality standard below the socially efficient level.

Source: Munich Personal RePEc Archive