Why The Journal?

David Horwitz 08 March, 2008 11:01 General, Open Permalink Trackbacks (0)

This is a fight I have been looking to start for some time. It comes from discussion about where we should be looking to publish our research outputs and reading about the restoration period in Europe (triggered in turn by reading Neil Stephenson's Baroque Trilogy).

The central question is this: “Why are we still talking about Journal, particularly electronic journals in the age of the Internet?” The academy seems to have a fixation on this example of 18th Century technology, and seems loath to face up to the fact that this specific from of publishing is now redundant. Now what do I mean by journal, and I am talking here about scholarly journals:

  1. The are bound – they contain a set number of articles

  2. the are periodic – they are produced at set intervals

  3. the articles conform to set, and strict, guidelines as to their length

We can quite clearly see the format of the print world being mimicked in the electronic world. Now when producing a physical artifact that needs to be distributed over distances, publishers need to be aware of size and weight restrictions, the cost of production is influenced by the length. These are restrictions that have existed since the birth of the scholarly journal, in the late 17th century. The scholarly societies needed a way to communicate with members not at their meetings, and like minded individuals across Europe. Printing technology had reached a point where this could be done and by the start of the 18th Century journals where produced in London (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society), Paris and Berlin.

With the advent of the Internet the economics have changed radically, information is no longer a scarce commodity. The you publish a specific article doesn't mean that you won't be publishing another. The fossilized journal article also a poor form for a hypertext environment – why not link to your data, your sources, include video? With the opportunities offered by the Internet we have the potential to make scholarly information available on a scale never imagined a mere 20 years ago, instead we seem to be cleaving to forms that are guaranteed to ensure the ongoing scarcity of information while simultaneously ensuring that much important information is not made available till after its obsolete.


comments

  1. Ja, boet...B-) It's because most journal still DO have a print version, that they persist in archaic format-and-length requirements. And of the ones that don't - like the new BMC or PLoS journals - they have PDF-format articles that have to comply with the SAME archaic formatting as if it were a print journal!!

    Maybe some day people will really wake up to the potential of the medium, and stop being so 19th century.

    Posted by Ed Rybicki — 09 Mar 2008, 12:41

  2. Great post, David! I could not have said it better.... And I feel almost the same as you. But: time is on our side. Change will come (just as it did in your country almost 20 years ago). Just wait and see what those so-called internet-generation kids will do once they are in power.

    Posted by Wytze Koopal — 10 Mar 2008, 16:53

  3. some journals are getting there. the question of how to do justice to reporting research without violating the findings through the medium of publication is an interesting research question in itself.

    Posted by re searcher — 10 Mar 2008, 21:20

  4. Oh, and the Baroque Trilogy HAS to be the publishing event of the last decade!! Couldn't put them down - and regretted finishing them once I had. Made me want to read "Crytonomicon" all over again, to pick up on all the little hints and allusions that make no sense till you read the later books.

    Posted by Ed R — 11 Mar 2008, 14:12


Add comment

Topic

Text

Your name

Your email address (if any)

Your personal page (if any)

authimage


Powered by LifeType
© 2006 - Design by Omar Romero (all rights reserved)