The Dr Paul Ngobeni Syndrome?

Unathi Kondile 22 June, 2009 10:07 Straight Up Permalink Trackbacks (0)

Whilst driving to the office this morning I see “UCT Parts ways with Ngobeni” – interesting. When I get to the office I see inbox headlines which can be summed up as “Ngobeni parts ways with UCT.” Mh-mm I must say I quite like the newspaper headline version which is in stark contrast to the following joint statement by the VC and now former Deputy Registrar.

“Having satisfactorily resolved the matters, Dr Ngobeni has expressed his wish to leave UCT to pursue other interests and we wish him all the very best in his future endeavours.”

Part of me would like to believe this and part of me would like not to. We will never know, owing to the confidential nature of the Disciplinary Hearings at our institution. But if anything goes and I were to embark on a speculative rant I’d say Dr Ngobeni has been firing warning shots ever since I first heard of his name here. How UCT made that appointment, of an alleged disbarred US lawyer and it lasted this long is way beyond me. Perhaps it was part of this transformation we so long to see at tertiary institutions. But how can a man who constantly puked on the doorstep of this institution at every occasion the media afforded him be now given such a ceremonious all the best for the future. If anything Dr Ngobeni has scratched so hard on the surface of UCT’s skin that we were left looking bloody racist. One need only quote the doctor’s most recent orders surrounding the law faculty which he describes as a faculty beset by a racist “group of gangsters” which is hell-bent on white domination on judiciary benches or let me rather prescribe the doctor’s orders verbatim: “Whites want to entrench themselves in the last unelected branch of government - the judiciary,” he told local media.

And again this is where it all goes pear-shaped with transformation. The only thing that could have landed our dear doctor here the job in question is his curriculum vitae credentials. No attempt was made to assess the character ‘itself’. And that is where I need to pause. I have often sat through lectures, listened to certain black staff members from various campuses across the country and wondered how on earth they were appointed. The answer: the CV. And yes, perhaps the curriculum vitae is one strong indicator of an incumbent’s potential but to what extent are these people grilled during interviews or is it just a rush to appoint a ‘transformee’ with great credentials? The fact of the matter is that if transformation is to be achieved within a university's staff complement there needs to be a change of targeting – there should be a much more concerted attempt at grooming our own black students into staff – this whole picking and selecting of celebrated black icons and academics needs to go, because quite frankly I do not believe that any black person above the age of 35, probably went to Fort Hare, Lovedale and other black fortresses of acedemia is immune to racism lenses. It’s just a sad matter of fact that the older generation of blacks who struggled hard to get to where they are academically are most likely to be race-sensitive. This can be a good and bad thing. Good in the sense that if they are right and perhaps a university's law faculty is indeed racist then that’s a good call, but if they are wrong and a university's law faculty is a sweet group of humming birds then that’s questionable.

If at this stage you’ve spotted this blowing-my-own-horn agenda I’ve got going here then it's inevitable that you’re fully aware that I am a proponent of the juniorisation of academics – particularly where blacks are concerned.

I have thought long and hard about this and finally figured that if universities want to attract more black students or perhaps let me say retain black students – there has to be a change of perspective and employment criteria. To say that by having black staff members, black students will feel much more at home is just hogwash, but by having younger black staff members you start creating an impression to aspire towards and a much more open gateway. Let’s face it – black people are culturally groomed not to approach their elders – we just have this unspoken respect law – that somehow makes older figures unapproachable where matters of opinion / emotion are concerned. As a child you keep your opinions to yourself. So younger black staff it must be. Now I know this might be a tad bit of a reductivist point of view but nonetheless it could be a start as opposed to hauling in wounded academics from the past.

And as for Dr Ngobeni, I too would like to wish him all the best for his future endeavours.


comments

  1. Unathi: great post! As one who has commented previously on the enigmatic Obi Wan, I think you have hit it spot-on. And I note that UCT appointment committees that I have been on make sure the "Ngobeni-Google" clause is invoked whenever an appointment is considered...simply so that we CAN find out what is in the public domain concerning that person, presumably after the embarrasment of hiring him without due vetting process.

    Posted by notmax — 22 Jun 2009, 10:35

  2. I must really comment on your article.I can say i agree with you robusly on 1 issue that its high time for UCT to start grooming young black academic talent on their backyard to cut out all these hiring problems.Tumi

    Posted by tumi — 22 Jun 2009, 10:54

  3. I don't know who Dr Ngobeni is but have a few issues to raise: what about " any white person above the age of 35, probably went to UCT, WITS, University of Natal, Rhodes, Stellenbosch, RAU etc other white fortresses of academia is immune to racism lenses(Unathi). Second: there is a different interview process at UCT, one for Whites only( no CVs required) and the other Blacks only(CVs count here)( interesting) Third, Black academic equals pimped up CVs and no skills( where do you fall here)and white academic equals competence

    Posted by mzambia — 22 Jun 2009, 15:25

  4. perhaps we need to understand that my focus on black academics is not a matter of racialising /racial profiling but more to do with the fact that black academics / management or shall I say transformation at universities is more about blacks i.e: get more blacks in and not really about getting more whites in, etc. And as such I don't think 'any white person above the age of 35 ...' might share similar experiences as their black counterparts largely because they were not the subjects of discrimination and as such will not, with age, have acquired any resentment of ‘the white man, did this to me, the white man did that’ or ‘this place is a boarding school for rich white kids only’ type… What ‘any white person above the age of 35…’ might have instead acquired could be nostalgia for the ‘good old days’ maybe – but not resentment or a sense of disenfranchisement per se. And you’re right - both races are equally capable of seeing through races lenses but it is what the eyes behind those lenses have seen and experienced that bases my argument on the age factor. As for perceptions of competence based on assumption or racial superiority and no CV handing-in? Well I have no knowledge of that. Only the recruitment side of UCT can answer that... 'Black academic equals pimped up CVs and no skills'? I'm not quite sure I get where you're going and how you'd define skill within an academic institution setting. But if this were to be applied to young black academics then I belive the term 'experience' or lack thereof would be more befitting - and this is where coaching/mentoring or grooming as tumi calls it should take place... Because the reality of the matter is that black academics will not just spring out of thin air - they need to be made and as such I am suggesting that universities such as our university start grooming their own.

    Posted by Unathi — 23 Jun 2009, 09:21

  5. Great post, Unathi! I think the central lesson from the "Doctor" Ngobeni saga is: if something looks too good to be true, it probably is. Come on, a black South African lawyer, with a doctorate, trained in the States, with credibility-by-association and opinions he's not afraid to share? When last did we have those queuing up for desk jockey jobs in Bremner? If the selection committee hadn't been so falling over themselves with delight at their success and had bothered to look a gift horse in the mouth, they'd have seen the reality, but TBH UCT doesn't have that good a track record of doing that - with white or black appointments. Of course, the other advantage you neglect to mention in appointing junior staff (of whatever shade) is... they cost less than more senior staff. And if the choice, in these recessionary times, is between "doing more with less" and making a junior appointment, it does become very attractive. So - when do you start?

    Posted by :) — 29 Jun 2009, 18:48

  6. He's not a real doctor. He doesn't have a doctorate.

    Posted by Dr Doctor — 30 Jun 2009, 19:24

  7. Having just read the post by this Unathi, I realise just how far UCT is still from the transformation goals that the country aspires to. It is very sad to realise that in the realm of this quagmire, there are 'black staff members' like Kondile (listed as a Senior Technical Officer at the School of Arts, whatever that means) who do not understand what the struggle of black people at UCT is (staff and students alike). Cocooned in his little office as a 'staff member' at Hiddingh, Kondile has not engaged with the day to day happenings on the main campus, where the UCT Climate survey found that the majority of non whites on that campus did not feel welcome at the university because of the untransformed institutional culture. Some of us have heard stories of black youth being told by their white lecturers, after only failing a first test, that they won't cut it at UCT and should go to their home universities, or that they won't pass Economics simply because they are black. Black staff members come and go because of the treatment they get, from administrators to academics. Kondile, seems quite comfortable at the School of Arts but I do find funny (besides the incoherent, not-well-written piece) that when it came to university debates on admissions policy, on transformation forums we have not heard from him. Student leaders are in need of guidance from their seniors but there are no mentors anymore. I do take it that Mr Kondile is very good at his job, seeing that he has the eye for people whom he says he has wondered from where they came. We must not hide behind blogs and be pseudo-liberals but must come out and be heard. That is the only way that UCT can be the best it should be, on all fronts. And no, Kondile, I do not find it too difficult to believe that a black lawyer can have a PhD from the US. Justice Hlophe is one of the most qualified legal practitioners we have in the country, with a PhD from Cambridge and having taught Law there. Next time, try to understand where people come from, and hear the disparaging stories the black youth have to tell about their lecturers and they things they say, especially in the Law Faculty [and others]. That's on Upper Campus, you can drive there or catch a shuttle.

    Posted by Makabongwe — 23 Jul 2009, 12:57

  8. @ Makabongwe: In the interests of being responsive on my blog I will engage with you. Firstly - I think you are missing the point - this is about Paul Ngobeni. This is about his behaviour as a staff member at the university. This is not about John Hlophe nor questioning black credentials or transformation as a whole. Secondly - I am sorry to hear about the trials of black people on upper campus. I'll admit I am a tad bit detached from that side, seeing as I am on Hiddingh, which would explain why I seldom attend nor receive invites to university debates. I would love to - but the very few that I have attended in past years or two have been centred around people who enjoy hearing their own voices and drowing others in superflous political jargon (hence you critise the "incoherent, not written well style" of a blog - note a 'blog'). Thirdly. I am going to write about transformation at the university, and with ad hominem responses like yours, it becomes easier to see how you become subjects as opposed to activists towards achieving your goals. It begins with the manner in which you engage and criticise others and a realisation that such matters are not truly about individuals but rather principles and policies that govern individuals. It is sad that people focus more on individuals and protecting their egos as opposed to tackling the subjects at hand. I have my own experiences of injustices and discrimination as an employee and past/present postgrad student - but that has never blinded me on what I am here to do: to work.

    Posted by Unathi Kondile — 29 Jul 2009, 14:35

  9. Nice one, Unathi

    Posted by JabuK — 07 Mar 2011, 14:40


Add comment

Topic

Text

Your name

Your email address (if any)

Your personal page (if any)

authimage


Powered by LifeType
© 2006 - Design by Omar Romero (all rights reserved)