The Cape Argus (18 Feb 2011, p 5) reports that Wendy Makgate, Chair of the Select Committee on Education and Recreation, described comments made by the Chair of the National Council for Library and Information Services as "discriminating" and "insulting" when he attempted to justify the board's failure to reach citizens living in "deep rural" communities.
The minutes and an audio recording of the Select Committee hearing is available here.
Two of the presentations related to libraries:-
The Chairperson pointed out that education was one of the key priorities
identified by the President, and that was interwoven with the need for
libraries, encouraging a culture of reading and use of indigenous
languages. The Department of Arts and Culture gave three presentations
on libraries and language. The first presentation set out the background
and progress of the Library Information Services Charter, which defined
the challenges facing the sector and would provide a framework for
eliminating illiteracy, inequality in the sector, promoting social
cohesion and building knowledge through reading. The Charter called for
institutional reform and changes in how librarians and managers of
educational institutions should work. The challenges included a lack of
national policy on norms and standards, the need to build more
libraries, since only 2.7% of schools had functioning libraries, the
need to review legislation to eliminate overlaps and confusion, and the
need to address and resolve the training, recruitment and retention of
librarians. Free and easy access for all to Library Information Services
was a basic right. Television and other means should be used to
resocialise citizens in Batho Pele values and to promote a culture of
reading. The National Library Board and Library and Information
Association should be given greater authority on issues directly
affecting them. Adequate funding, and an independent monitoring and
evaluation system, should be put in place. Members asked what measures
were proposed to overcome the challenges and overlapping mandates, noted
too much concentration on English, including SABC 1, and asked about
the role of the National Library Board. Members were concerned about the
closure of Library Science departments at universities, and asked how
and when the Department intended to address the challenges, and who had
been consulted. Members stressed the need also to involve the community
and parents who were home-schooling, asked if visits had been paid to
schools, and cited several instances where library books were packed
away and unused. They also stressed that these problems were compounded
in rural areas.
The second presentation outlined the Community Libraries Grant, which
was targeted primarily at disadvantaged communities, and which was
intended to transform urban and rural community library infrastructure,
facilities and services through a recapitalised programme at provincial
level, supporting local government. The spending since 2009 was set out.
The achievements included close working relationships with the SA
Library for the Blind, republication of African literature classics and
drafting of a Community Library Information Services Bill that would set
the framework for developing norms and standards for the community
libraries. Challenges included staff turnover and negotiations on
service level agreements, as well as complex and difficult relationships
with the Department of Public Works around infrastructure requirements.
Members regretted that the provincial departments were not available to
answer questions, and queried why the MECs were apparently not working
out allocations properly to ensure capacity and adequate budget. They
were concerned about withholding of grant funding due to lack of
spending, questioned whether it could be reallocated to other projects,
and questioned fiscal dumping in the last quarter. Members requested
breakdowns of spending by province, and pointed out that it was
necessary to establish who was using the libraries, and whether they
were truly accessible. They questioned why the library profession was
not seen as attractive, especially since bursaries were available.
Several Members were severely critical of the report on infrastructure
progress, pointing out that it did not accord with the reality on the
ground. They urged the Department not to rely solely on written reports,
but to monitor the situation by sending inspectors, and to monitor the
transfer of funds from province to municipality. The relationship with
the Department of Public Works was questioned.